≤ 1500 km
€250All flights in this distance band.
A short overview of what Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — a European regulation that applies across the EU — gives you. Not advice — an honest map of the terrain. Want to claim right away? Use the tool.
From the moment it's clear your flight went wrong — including while you're still at the airport, including weeks later. A claim rarely wraps up with the first letter. The tool saves your progress and walks you through each follow-up step. You have 5 years to file the claim before it lapses.
On an arrival delay of 3 hours or more (or on cancellation), the of Article 7 apply (see also Bossen C-559/16 on distance measurement):
All flights in this distance band.
Intra-EU flights >1500 km and all other flights 1500–3500 km.
Non-intra-EU flights above 3500 km.
| Distance | Amount | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ≤ 1500 km | €250 | All flights in this distance band. |
| 1500 – 3500 km | €400 | Intra-EU flights >1500 km and all other flights 1500–3500 km. |
| > 3500 km | €600 | Non-intra-EU flights above 3500 km. |
Distance is calculated as between original departure and final destination — Bossen C-559/16.
is no free pass. The airline must prove that (1) the cause was genuinely beyond its control and (2) even with reasonable preparation the delay was not avoidable. How the most common excuses stack up against Court of Justice (CJEU) rulings:
Not an extraordinary circumstance — operational failures are part of normal operations.
Confirms: unexpected failures within normal operations also do not fall under the exception.
IS an extraordinary circumstance — exception to Wallentin-Hermann/van der Lans.
Extraordinary circumstance; carrier must show reasonable measures.
Not an extraordinary circumstance — internal labour unrest is part of normal operations.
Krüsemann and Others v TUIfly (C-195/17 and Others (joined))
Not an extraordinary circumstance; own-staff dropouts are within actual control.
TAP Portugal — death of co-pilot (flightright/Myflyright) (C-156/22, C-157/22 and C-158/22 (joined))
Only valid if the CAUSE of that previous delay was itself extraordinary; delay is measured at the final destination.
Can be an extraordinary circumstance (Recital 14), but the carrier must specifically show that the weather made operation impossible AND that buffer time was scheduled.
Eglītis and Ratnieks v Latvijas Republikas Ekonomikas ministrija / Air Baltic (C-294/10)
Extraordinary circumstance only if the system is under airport control and beyond carrier control.
Extraordinary circumstance — damage cause lies outside carrier responsibility.
| Airline excuse | Doctrine | CJEU ruling |
|---|---|---|
| Technical defect / maintenance failure | Not an extraordinary circumstance — operational failures are part of normal operations. | Wallentin-Hermann v Alitalia (C-549/07) |
| Unexpected technical failure without poor maintenance | Confirms: unexpected failures within normal operations also do not fall under the exception. | Van der Lans v KLM (C-257/14) |
| Hidden design defect acknowledged by manufacturer | IS an extraordinary circumstance — exception to Wallentin-Hermann/van der Lans. | Matkustaja A v Finnair (C-385/23) |
| Bird strike | Extraordinary circumstance; carrier must show reasonable measures. | Pešková and Peška v Travel Service (C-315/15) |
| Wildcat strike of own staff | Not an extraordinary circumstance — internal labour unrest is part of normal operations. | Krüsemann and Others v TUIfly (C-195/17 and Others (joined)) |
| Own crew shortage (illness, FDP, scheduling) | Not an extraordinary circumstance; own-staff dropouts are within actual control. | TAP Portugal — death of co-pilot (flightright/Myflyright) (C-156/22, C-157/22 and C-158/22 (joined)) |
| Delay on a previous flight | Only valid if the CAUSE of that previous delay was itself extraordinary; delay is measured at the final destination. | Air France v Folkerts (C-11/11) |
| Weather conditions | Can be an extraordinary circumstance (Recital 14), but the carrier must specifically show that the weather made operation impossible AND that buffer time was scheduled. | Eglītis and Ratnieks v Latvijas Republikas Ekonomikas ministrija / Air Baltic (C-294/10) |
| Fuel-supply / airport-system failure | Extraordinary circumstance only if the system is under airport control and beyond carrier control. | SATA International — Azores Airlines (C-308/21) |
| Foreign object (FOD) damages tyre | Extraordinary circumstance — damage cause lies outside carrier responsibility. | Germanwings v Pauels (C-501/17) |
«FDP» = Flight Duty Period: legal duty-time limits for crew. For each ruling: link to EUR-Lex. Full set at /transparency.
No response or a rejection is normal — almost everyone gets one. Here is the escalation ladder, step by step.
Day 0: send a claim letter (this tool, step 1) — right after the flight or as soon as possible. Most airlines reject valid claims first. Pushing on to step 2 is the rule, not the exception.
An EU 261 claim is a money claim under contract. Under the airline gets a reasonable period to pay — in NL collection practice usually 14 days. Source: BW 6:82. Paste their response into step 2 of this tool and you'll get a notice-of-default letter with CJEU case law.
The kantonrechter handles civil cases up to €25,000. You are the claimant, the airline is the defendant. Below the main lines.
No — for claims up to €25,000 you may litigate in person. Verbatim Rv art. 79 paragraph 1: «Parties may litigate in person in cases before the kantonrechter» (Rv art. 79).
Digitally via Mijn Rechtspraak / «Geld eisen»: rechtspraak.nl/Onderwerpen/Geld-eisen (Rechtspraak money claims).
One-time court filing fee — only you as claimant pay. If you win the case, you get the filing fee back. Current rate: Rechtspraak.nl filing fee kanton (Rechtspraak court fees).
Varies by court; plan on several months between filing and hearing. The Rechtspraak publishes normalised lead times by area of law in its annual report — see Rechtspraak statistics.
With an enforceable judgment you can engage a bailiff for execution (attachment of balances or assets). Filing fees and procedural costs are usually awarded back to you on a successful claim. Procedure via Rechtspraak.nl — Geld eisen (Rechtspraak money claims).
This is not legal advice. The process is described as it appears on Rechtspraak.nl.
The period varies by country — what governs is the law of the country where the airline is established, or the country of departure or arrival.
| Country | Period | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 5 years | BW 3:307 |
| Germany | 3 years | § 195 BGB |
| Belgium | 1 year | Court of Cassation 2018 |
| France | 5 years | Art. 2224 Code civil |
| Spain | 5 years | Art. 1964 Código Civil |
Periods DE/BE/FR/ES are indicative; for certainty: ask ECC-NL or a local lawyer.
A registered letter in which you unambiguously assert your right to payment stops the clock (). Verbatim BW 3:317 paragraph 1: «The limitation of a right of action for performance of an obligation is interrupted by a written demand or a written notice in which the creditor unambiguously reserves their right to performance.» (BW 3:317). Send by registered mail → proof of dispatch and date.
Paying yourself? Keep receipts and claim reimbursement. Verbatim source: Art. 9 EU 261.
On cancellation or a delay of ≥5 hours you choose:
Verbatim source: Art. 8 EU 261.
If the airline has sold more tickets than seats, it first asks for volunteers willing to give up their seat (Art. 4 paragraph 1). Only after that may it deny passengers against their will (paragraph 2).
Denied? Then immediately you get:
Verbatim source: Art. 4 EU 261.
If the airline places you in a lower class than your ticket, you get within 7 days a percentage of the ticket price back:
| Distance | Refund |
|---|---|
| ≤ 1500 km | 30 % |
| 1500 – 3500 km (incl. intra-EU > 1500 km) | 50 % |
| > 3500 km | 75 % |
Verbatim source: Art. 10 EU 261.
The airline is required (Article 14) to inform you in writing about your rights before departure. On cancellation or denied boarding they must even hand the rules to you on paper. Many airlines don't. A missed notice is not separately compensated, but it strengthens your negotiating position. Source: Art. 14 EU 261.